From the perspective of sovereignty theory, we'll find that the case of “South China Sea Arbitration” is the issue of sovereignty which is not covered by compulsory arbitration. The pattern of sovereignty at present is a special mode of absolute sovereignty, in essence. Governing body is consciously trying to polarize the contents of the sovereignty to set up an orderly exterior environment under which the core content of the sovereignty will be well protected. The errors of “South China Sea Arbitration” are wrongly comprehending  the core content of the sovereignty, abusing  the compulsory arbitration, and damnifying the sovereignty of China by act in excess of authority. When the core content of sovereignty was damnified, China's position is a necessary protection which is consistent with the principle of sovereign equality of states and supported by the theory of sovereignty.

Systematization is the key method to improve Chinas legislation after its primitive accumulation. Deficiencies such as lack of integrality， proper structure and coordination in Chinas current marine legislation need to be solved by way of systematization. Comparing with the traditional paths of legal systematization， it is more rational to achieve this goal through the approach of comprehensive legislations. With this approach of legal systematization， enacting Ocean Basic Law， expanding Maritime Law to a comprehensive legislation shall be the priorities of future marine legislation．

In the current international politics，its the prerequisites for a great power to win the first opportunity in the complicated and changeable international politics that always focus on the changing relations among international political actors. Therefore， China needs to know the prospects of Russia and ASEAN relationship in order to grasp the variation of great power relationship in ASEAN region. Through the application of cooperative game theory ， the paper assumes real return and expected return as a cooperative surplus of key index，discusses the Russia and ASEAN relations. This paper approaches this conclusion， although Russia and ASEAN have a strong willingness to develop bilateral relations， the relations of Russia and ASEAN will still be in the level of development in the short run for lack of cooperation surplus. Of course， there is possibility of trigger in Russia and ASEAN relations， whether the current international politics appear adjustments which affect the Russia and ASEAN relations， there Russia and ASEAN relations will trend closer or alienated．

On February 10， 2014， Taiwan authorities brought out the new high-school Chinese and Social Studies curriculum outlines， which was called “103 Curriculum Outline”. The curriculum outlines sparked widespread controversies， and the essence of which is the controversy of two kinds of historical perspectives， that is “China-centered historical perspective” and “Taiwan-centered historical perspective”. At first， the field of history in Taiwan was led by “China-centered historical perspective”， and it was gradually challenged and “marginalized” soon afterwards. At last， “Taiwan-centered historical perspective” prevailed， which led to the “localization” of Taiwan history research， behind which there are some complex and profound political and social reasons. The inheritance and rupture of the pedigree of Taiwan history research directly influence the evolution of “historical perspective” and high-school history curriculum outline， which is worthy concerning and pondering．