Consensus and Disputes of Macroprudential Global Financial Governance" /> macroprudential regulation, global financial governance, systemic risk, risk of &ldquo,too big to fail”, procyclicalit,"/> 共识与争论——宏观审慎性全球金融治理评析
 
 
 
太平洋学报
经济与社会 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
共识与争论——宏观审慎性全球金融治理评析
南开大学
Consensus and Disputes of Macroprudential Global Financial Governance
Nankai University

全文: PDF (1055 KB)  
摘要 

自2008年金融危机以来,宏观审慎性金融监管已成为全球金融治理体系的核心内容,国家和国际金融监管主体就宏观审慎性监管理念和实践达成了基本共识。 理念共识表现在对宏观审慎性概念的起源、政策目标和内在逻辑的认知方面,实践共识则主要表现在宏观审慎性金融监管的国际制度建设方面,具体涉及系统性风险的识别和测量,以及应对时间维度和跨行业维度系统性风险的政策工具。 虽然达成基本的观念和实践共识,但宏观审慎性全球金融治理依然存在诸多分歧和争论,包括政策工具分类多样化、机构设置差异化和挑战、政策执行的差异性、有效性整体评估的不足和困难、政策边界模糊及外溢性、大国政策波动及共识弱化。 维系共识和解决分歧是保持制度变迁动力和趋势,进而推动全球金融治理体系持续完善的关键。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张发林
关键词 宏观审慎性监管全球金融治理系统性风险“大而不能倒”风险顺周期性    
Abstract
Since the global financial crisis in 2008, macroprudential financial regulation has become a new core of global financial governance, and national and international regulators have reached consensus on the idea and practice of macroprudential regulation. Ideational consensus lies in cognition of the conceptual and empirical origin, policy objectives, and inner logic of macroprudential regulation, while practical consensus mainly relates to the development of international institutions regarding macroprudential regulation. These international institutions specifically involve the identification and measurement of systemic risks and policy tools coping with time⁃dimension and cross⁃section⁃dimension systemic risks. Despite these ideational and practical consensuses, macroprudential global financial governance still faces many disputes and debates,including diversified categorization of policy tools, differentiation and challenges of institutional structure,gap of policy implementation, deficiency and difficulty of comprehensive assessment, spillover and ambiguity of policy application, fluctuation of major powers’ policies, and erosion of consensus among major economies. Consolidating consensus and handling disputes are crucial to secure the persistent improvement of global financial governance.
Key wordsmacroprudential regulation')" href="#">   
    
基金资助:本文系2018年国家社科基金后期资助项目“中国与全球金融治理的国际政治经济学分析”(18FZZ004)的阶段性研究成果。
作者简介: 张发林,男,湖北恩施人,南开大学周恩来政府管理学院副教授,博士生导师,法学博士,主要研究方向:国际政治经济学。
引用本文:   
张发林. 共识与争论——宏观审慎性全球金融治理评析[J]. 太平洋学报, 2019, 27(2): 50-62. ZHANG Falin.
Consensus and Disputes of Macroprudential Global Financial Governance
. 太平洋学报, 2019, 27(2): 50-62.
链接本文:  
http://www.pacificjournal.com.cn/CN/     或     http://www.pacificjournal.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V27/I2/50
:
版权所有 © 2015 《太平洋学报》编辑部©电话/传真:010-68575728   京ICP备17004193号-2
地址:北京市丰台区马官营家园3号院
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发    后台管理