|
|
|
| On the Infeasibility of the Motion of ‘Five Countries and Six Parties in the South China Sea Sovereignty Dispute |
| Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872，China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the intensification of the South China Sea sovereignty dispute, Taiwan put forward the “Five Countries and Six Parties” motion on the basis of the previous “Five Countries and Five Parties” motion in the South China Sea sovereignty dispute, which is basically supported by the four countries have made claims over the South China Sea and the United States. After the “Five Countries and Six Parties” motion is put forward, the Taiwan authorities and some scholars on both sides of the strait agree on it, and actively suggest that the mainland should consider accepting it. In my opinion, in the South China Sea sovereignty dispute, Taiwans “Five Countries and Six Parties” motion is intended to highlight Taiwans subjectivity and its “sovereign state” status, which is not conducive to maintaining the “One China” principle; The four countries support to the “Five Countries and Six Parties” motion is aiming to jointly confront China, which is not conducive to safeguarding Chinas sovereignty of the South China Sea. Therefore, the “Five Countries and Six Parties” motion is not feasible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
